NOTHING: The Science of Emptiness


(Intro tune) good evening everyone. claps Where’s my jetpack? I wanted to arrive on a jetpack here at the science festival, i think that’s much more appropriate. Anyway it’s great to be here.
Think of me as uhh your launch vehicle to an area of very sophisticated science Empty Space is Full of Profound Implications for How We View the Universe

100 Comments

  1. Gerald Orford

    October 8, 2017 at 1:21 am

    You enter this world with nothing … you leave this world with nothing … so what have you lost? ….. nothing.

  2. Mohamed . S. El Naschie

    October 10, 2017 at 6:08 pm

    Most popular papers in Natural Science

    Open Access
    A Casimir-Dark Energy Nano Reactor Design—Phase One
    Mohamed S. El Naschie
    Abstract | References Full-Text HTML XML Pub. Date: May 27, 2015
    DOI: 10.4236/ns.2015.76032 23,208 Downloads 24,266 Views Citations
    Open Access
    Quantum Dark Energy from the Hyperbolic Transfinite Cantorian Geometry of the Cosmos
    Mohamed S. El Naschie
    Abstract | References Full-Text HTML XML Pub. Date: March 17, 2016
    DOI: 10.4236/ns.2016.83018 22,508 Downloads 32,957 Views Citations
    Open Access
    Kerr Black Hole Geometry Leading to Dark Matter and Dark Energy via E-Infinity Theory and the Possibility of a Nano Spacetime Singularities Reactor
    Mohamed S. El Naschie
    Abstract | References Full-Text HTML XML Pub. Date: April 23, 2015
    DOI: 10.4236/ns.2015.74024 22,491 Downloads 24,176 Views Citations
    Open Access
    Cantorian-Fractal Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy as the Ordinary and Dark Energy Density of the Cosmos Respectively
    Mohamed S. El Naschie
    Abstract | References Full-Text HTML XML Pub. Date: December 2, 2016
    DOI: 10.4236/ns.2016.812052 22,445 Downloads 24,518 Views
    Open Access
    On El Naschie’s Fractal-Cantorian Space-Time and Dark Energy—A Tutorial Review
    Leila Marek-Crnjac
    Abstract | References Full-Text HTML XML Pub. Date: December 10, 2015
    DOI: 10.4236/ns.2015.713058 22,443 Downloads 23,893 Views Citations

  3. 1WaySafe

    October 12, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    I would like to have heard a quick synopsis of axiomatics by the panel .

  4. 8alot4t

    October 14, 2017 at 12:06 pm

    Wow – does anyone realise that this is a magnificent discovery (not the fact that ships will creep together of course) but the cosmological significance of this Casimir effect is massive!!!

  5. 8alot4t

    October 14, 2017 at 1:42 pm

    They were supposed to have included a string theorist for his ideas, but the organisers announced that he was tied up in traffic.

  6. Wyn Lewis

    October 15, 2017 at 9:55 pm

    The moderator makes quips every time he speaks that he actually becomes predictable and boring.   He's way ahead of Bob Hope !

  7. World Science Festival

    October 18, 2017 at 6:42 pm

    Hello, YouTubers. The World Science Festival is looking for enthusiastic translation ambassadors for its YouTube translation project. To get started, all you need is a Google account.

    Check out NOTHING: The Science of Emptiness to see how the process works: http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=BCUmeE8sIVo

    To create your translation, just type along with the video and save when done.
    Check out the full list of programs that you can contribute to here: http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?c=UCShHFwKyhcDo3g7hr4f1R8A&tab=2 

    The World Science Festival strives to cultivate a general public that's informed and awed by science. Thanks to your contributions, we can continue to share the wonder of scientific discoveries with the world.

  8. Jac Flasche

    October 20, 2017 at 9:42 pm

    They got that wrong. . . . Should be: } { or }{

  9. judgegixxer

    October 21, 2017 at 6:16 pm

    This comment section is a vast sea of nothing.

  10. Molochkai

    October 24, 2017 at 9:01 pm

    This entire festival is such a joke.

  11. Mohamed . S. El Naschie

    October 30, 2017 at 8:15 am

    1:13:28
    محاضرة العالم المصرى الكبير الاستاذ محمد النشائى بامريكا The Universe as a Golden Supercomputer

    Scorpion300100
    315 views
    2 weeks ago

    1:13:28
    The Universe as a Golden Supercomputer

    Claregate Metaphysics Group
    317 views
    4 weeks ago

  12. Alban Angelito

    October 30, 2017 at 2:52 pm

    What if it is "nothing" or no-thing that is perceiving this existence of "something" or somthing?

  13. Blither box

    October 30, 2017 at 4:49 pm

    Where did Spider-Man come from? Is he or is he not a form of directed energy? His impact on civilization is greater than many so called world leaders. Yet unlike Superman he didn't come from another planet. How many calories are burned just thinking about it? Zero is vacuum. The question, "What do you want?" invites an answer. Why? How many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Pop? What is the Great Attractor? Do you see that symbol at the end of the last several questions which appears again at the end of this one and one more time after? Why does it exist?  Vacuum. That's why.

  14. chuck talbot

    November 7, 2017 at 1:04 pm

    John hockenberry does a fantastic job. He pretends to be ignorant but he is smart.

  15. Tokaji Leo

    November 12, 2017 at 2:27 pm

    why don't quarks and antiquarks annihilate? and if antimatter lost in the beginning, why are there still antiquarks?

  16. Ayla Rayne

    November 18, 2017 at 9:19 pm

    i got a theory for 'what/who created the big bang/universe.' i think god created the universe, think of it, god is EVERYTHING. so, i think HE created the 'big gang'. he's everything, right? the one question that bugs me is "how did god exist in the first place?". well if i add that to my giant brain of knowledge, then, energy created the 'big bang'. energy existed even if energy didn't(more simple way; energy existed even when life/the universe wasn't existing) something may have happened that made energy make 'the big bang'. let's move when god died bla bla idk how to explain that he is now god, so..? energy made people(including god), so, uh, some event made god die, bla bla. now energy made heaven somehow, and god is the first to die, so he is the ruler, and then the people dies too(time to time), and one day this angel wanted to rule heaven, and god got offended(being funny)- i mean mad so he made the angel go to hell(he made hell/energy made hell), and when he did, he is the ruler of hell, i forgot his name. so, thank energy, energy created everything/everyone. thank energy or we wouldn't be alive.

    Español(spanish):

    obtuve una teoría para 'qué / quién creó el Big Bang / universo'. Creo que Dios creó el universo, piensa en él, Dios lo es TODO. entonces, creo que EL creó la 'pandilla grande'. él es todo, ¿verdad? la única pregunta que me molesta es "¿cómo existió Dios en primer lugar?". Bueno, si agrego eso a mi cerebro gigante del conocimiento, entonces, la energía creó el "Big Bang". la energía existía incluso si la energía no existiera (de manera más simple, la energía existía incluso cuando la vida / el universo no existía), algo pudo haber sucedido que hizo que la energía fuera 'el big bang'. vamos a movernos cuando Dios murió bla bla idk cómo explicar que él ahora es Dios, entonces …? la energía hizo a la gente (incluido dios), así que, algún evento hizo morir a dios, bla bla. ahora la energía hizo el cielo de alguna manera, y Dios es el primero en morir, entonces él es el gobernante, y luego la gente también muere (de vez en cuando), y un día este ángel quiso gobernar el cielo, y Dios se ofendió (siendo gracioso) – digo enfadado así que hizo que el ángel se fuera al infierno (hizo del infierno / la energía hizo el infierno), y cuando lo hizo, él es el gobernante del infierno, olvidé su nombre. entonces, gracias a la energía, la energía creó todo / todos. gracias a la energía o no estaríamos vivos.

    swedish:

    Jag fick en teori för "vad / som skapade big bang / universum." jag tror att gud skapade universum, tänk på det, gud är allting. så jag tror att han skapade det stora gänget. Han är allt, eller hur? Den enda frågan som fel mig är "hur existerade Gud i första hand?". ja, om jag lägger till det i min kungliga hjärna av kunskap, så skapade energi "big bang". energi fanns även om energi inte gjorde det (enklare sätt, energi fanns även när livet / universum inte existerade) kan något ha hänt, som gjorde energi som "big bang". låt oss flytta när gud dog bla bla idk hur man förklarar att han är nu gud, så ..? energilagda människor (inklusive gud), så, det var en händelse som gjordes gud dö, bla bla. nu har energi skapat himlen på något sätt, och gud är den första att dö, så han är linjalen, och då dör också människorna (gång till gång) och en dag ville denna ängel styra himlen och gud blev förolämpad (vara rolig) – Jag menar galen så han gjorde ängeln gå till helvetet (han gjorde helvete / energi gjort helvete), och när han gjorde det, är han helvets härskare, jag glömde hans namn. så tack energi, energi skapade allt / alla. tack energi eller vi skulle inte leva.

  17. statikreg

    November 20, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    I think we really need to stop using the word "observer" when talking about quantum mechanics, or we're never going to hear the end of the woowoo questions and "theories".

    Also, why don't they turn up some of these guys' mics? Or some post processing in the video.

  18. IIIIIawesIIIII

    November 22, 2017 at 5:48 pm

    this was a really awesome talk! please bring these guys together again! 😀

  19. NagaHumanbeing ZooOfParticles

    December 8, 2017 at 8:02 am

    I control you.

  20. NagaHumanbeing ZooOfParticles

    December 8, 2017 at 8:29 am

    Hawking Radiation. Ponder it.

  21. NagaHumanbeing ZooOfParticles

    December 8, 2017 at 8:47 am

    Even Sophia won't be able to solve about nothing.😎

  22. NagaHumanbeing ZooOfParticles

    December 8, 2017 at 9:06 am

    finished it.. And it was Gold.

  23. Isaam Rafee

    December 11, 2017 at 7:24 pm

    whatever it is.. its something, not nothing..

  24. BenoitVibeS [Official]

    January 22, 2018 at 4:24 pm

    Would you have a transcript of this?

  25. Stellan Kinberg

    January 24, 2018 at 10:09 pm

    I thought the term plasmasphere were to be mentioned by this panel but no. We are not surrounded by vacuum or nothing but by plasma. I thought about space plasmasphere in http://www.kinberg.net/2017/10/29/space-not-empty/ You mentioned quarks and antiquarks but what are they part of? Sun wind too?. Are all stars are those who produce the plasma (electrons and positive atoms) in Universe. But I got no answer unfortunenately here.

  26. Ed one

    January 27, 2018 at 12:20 am

    GOD the ALPHIA AND Omega the beginning and the end at the same time…GOD…it's in a bible….

  27. Conrad Paulson

    February 11, 2018 at 2:30 am

    To speak about "nothing" is to speak about "something" can't be done! Nothing can't be defined! Try…

  28. James Richard Wiley

    February 12, 2018 at 3:01 pm

    Space contracts upon itself to form the universe. The universe expands to become space. Since we cannot conceive of nothingness the word "nothingness" has no meaning.

  29. Stanley Schuckman

    February 27, 2018 at 1:15 pm

    Nothingness' power is like gravity, it must be discovered, because like gravity, nothingness doesn't produce any action as it stands alone. Both require the existence of each other to disclose the nature of their power. However, paradoxically, both nothingness and physical mass (the source of gravity) possess unimaginable power as both stand alone. I submit, it was through the merging of both states that is the universe's everlasting source of power, and the source that sustains that power, forever…I think I can prove this. I submit these thoughts, to "attract" response,…..

  30. Axel Shark's Theoretical Discovery

    February 27, 2018 at 10:26 pm

    The answer to why there's something rather than nothing: If there's nothing there, the meaning of nothingness can't exist either. This is the reason why something is there, rather than nothing. Simple math logic!

  31. Koen De Vriendt

    March 12, 2018 at 10:12 am

    nothing is a thing! the a-(matter-energy-space-time ) a stands for not

  32. atomicrooster56

    April 14, 2018 at 3:37 am

    John, George and Paul. Awesome. Other dude should have been called Ringo.

  33. Bob Aldo

    May 1, 2018 at 1:19 pm

    Nothing "exists" nowhere but in the human imagination.

  34. Carlos Alejandro Quintanilla

    May 30, 2018 at 4:36 am

    Every time they say anti paricle I just hear hentai particle

  35. Angie B.

    June 14, 2018 at 5:05 pm

    that is not nothing. Something is not nothing. They have defined something as nothing. " lying to self"

  36. rani chugh

    July 1, 2018 at 5:55 pm

    Great discussion..for me time is always linear..but like when we are enjoying life or in a discussion it seems to travel….

  37. Tim Aaron

    July 17, 2018 at 8:56 am

    can you use a plastic or ceramic plate and still get cashmere effect

  38. MIKE GELUK

    July 18, 2018 at 4:43 am

    Absolutely nothing!!

  39. Sebastian Maynard

    July 19, 2018 at 6:05 am

    Its lovely to watch so intelligance people be so ignorant about nothing <3

  40. High Pitch

    July 25, 2018 at 9:47 pm

    24 minutes in and the first guy is still giving his speech. At this rate, there will be no time for the interesting bit.

  41. Joseph Russel Timpug Ison

    August 9, 2018 at 11:43 pm

    There is no such thing as nothing otherwise science theories will collapse. Everything will collapse 🤦‍♂️

  42. Joseph Russel Timpug Ison

    August 10, 2018 at 12:48 am

    The moderator’s last question/comment was foolish. We make do with what we have until we progress again in our reality. Even at present we are so full of “un-nothings” that we don’t even know what to do with them 🤬

  43. Alan Lloyd

    August 13, 2018 at 4:34 pm

    there is no such thing as "nothing". ive come to realize that. there may as well have been "nothing" before you were born because you had no conscience, but there WAS SOMETHING.

  44. Alan Lloyd

    August 13, 2018 at 4:38 pm

    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "NOTHING"…. that thought takes a while to realize, but here is the most bizarre question : HOW IS THERE SOMETHING , RATHER THAN NOTHING???
    i find that question really interesting. i dont think there is a god, certainly not a personal god. that concept is just human made bullshit.

  45. Ribeye Robert D

    August 18, 2018 at 3:55 am

    Blood cell chairs.
    Awesome!

  46. Bethwyn Malcolm

    September 14, 2018 at 1:17 pm

    There is nothing and it is full of apparent somethings.

  47. Bo the Wolf

    September 15, 2018 at 7:17 pm

    Made it over an hour before a politically charged comment….not bad, I guess.

  48. Chamara Maraweera

    September 22, 2018 at 1:22 pm

    Nothing exists without our mind.

  49. Kevin Sullivan

    October 2, 2018 at 6:35 pm

    Was considering why the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light at the fringes. Perhaps space becomes more frictionless as the void becomes less dense. The laws of physics warps where matter does not exist in any significant way. So the idea of a true vacuum may be possible between universes. This void is measurable and matter can occupy it so its technically not nothing. That being said I dont think something can exist in nothing otherwise it would be something by definition. Something can exist in the void but thats completely different than existing within absolute nothingness with zero attributes. So the idea that our observable universe is surrounded by nothing is not possible as you have competing states of reality at the transition between something and nothing. This would be very unstable as you have a measurable state colliding with the immeasurable state of nothingness. Therefore its interesting to consider that there will always be something. But consider this possibility just to play devils advocate. If matter expands quicker than the speed of light at the edge of the universe we are clearly observing a breakdown in the laws of physics. Is a vacuum void of matter and of the laws of physics nothing? Is there a transition state between something and nothing? Is the universe expanding at an accelerated rate our witness to that? Are we witnessing space time physics break down with diluted matter approaching the absence of matter? Does this make it nothing? Or as close to it as possible?

  50. M I

    October 6, 2018 at 4:19 pm

    Too many retards commenting about things they know fuck all about……this is too much for some….just pass bye and carry on reading the gutter press and leave this to house of us who understand……in short sod orff

  51. Alabama Mothman

    October 9, 2018 at 12:24 am

    God spoke the universe into creation. Scientist only wish to be on pare with God.

  52. Malcolm Lewis

    October 9, 2018 at 8:08 pm

    They are all talking about something because if they attempted to talk about nothing they would have nothing to say , ie they would all be silent.

  53. acolytes777

    October 10, 2018 at 7:29 pm

    Nothing scientific here, all mere philosophy

  54. Steve Stelly

    October 31, 2018 at 7:24 pm

    This was well explained I learned Nothing! Well I mean I learned about nothing. Which means I learned something. I learned something about nothing. Nothing has always been something. Some people have been doing nothing their whole lives. But that isn't saying anything. so to sum it up Learning about nothing IS learning about something. I learned nothing is something. – where is my Nobel prize? … and you should get one too for reading all this. I like you. Youtube commentor 🙂

  55. rustic35

    November 1, 2018 at 4:36 am

    The two on the left are dressed like complete dorks and their mum must still cut their hair. 🤣

  56. JORDAN

    November 10, 2018 at 4:09 am

    Thanks for nothing, World Science Festival.

  57. Aracoixo

    November 12, 2018 at 2:35 am

    World Science Carnival

  58. Arthur Hau

    November 15, 2018 at 10:10 pm

    Water wave propagates through water. Water particles serve as a medium but water particles are not water wave itself. In fact, water particles resist the energy dissipation from the source of the water wave. Water particles have mass (inertia) to resist such dissipation. Sound wave propagates through air. Air particles again have inertia that resists the dissipation of energy from the source of sound wave. How about light? Well, obviously light is a wave that causes disturbance of something in the space it travels through. Something with some kind of inertia that exists in our so-called space will resist the dissipation of energy from a light source. Otherwise, light will have an infinite velocity!!! These things do not have mass inertia but instead have magnetic and electric inertia in order to resist the energy dissipation from the source of light energy!! I suggest that this substance can be detected because they have magnetic and electric inertia! I am surprised all physicists do not think about this possibility!!!??? Perhaps Einstein should be blamed because he was confused. Just because energy can only be transmitted in a discrete manner, it does not mean that light wave is consist of particles like electrons! Water wave is not consist of water particles; water particles only serve as a medium!

  59. Graham Daw

    November 16, 2018 at 10:15 am

    Half a million people learnt……

  60. Graham Daw

    November 16, 2018 at 10:25 am

    If life did not exist ( no concept ) then nothing or something would become equal. It is the corruption of thought and interpretation that creates indifference. Graham Daw, Yorkshire, UK

  61. Graham Daw

    November 16, 2018 at 10:29 am

    The canvas is as important as the painting. gd. Yorkshire, UK

  62. Josh Swann

    November 16, 2018 at 11:05 am

    Nothing does exist. If we can fathom it we can find it and/or create it.

  63. ram nivas

    December 2, 2018 at 12:04 pm

    the concept of nothingness was invented not in greece it was in indian subcontinent. its embedded in indian philosophical thought. nothingness is a state of mind experienced by a meditator, the concept of digit zero is an abstract term to represent nothingness, WHY ARE U SPREADING FALSE INFORMATION, its common habit of westerners to steel native inventions and make their own, SO PATHETIC…

  64. anwarul mamoon

    December 7, 2018 at 5:49 pm

    To me the big question "Why there is something instead of -NOTHING-" is the most silly question ever asked in science. Because since we have at all no idea of what is "Nothing",then why are we asking "why there is no "Nothing",or "Why there is something rather nothing?Can any body explain what is "NOTHING"?I can challenge no one can explain it.This is because when we think of'Nothing'we always think side by side presence of something.Can any body imagine without existence of us or the universe what it could be then?Our understanding of 'Nothing" is either like a void black space or something which we can not even imagine,that means it is beyond human imagination,so why we are asking this question "NOTHING"?

  65. Mihai Hosu

    December 16, 2018 at 12:26 pm

    I'll start off by saying that I'm a huge science enthusiast and an avid reader of scientific literature, but there's fundamental problem with physics that even physicists tend to sweep under the rug. Physics simply can't deal with absolute zero and absolute nothing. All of physics is based on a pre-existent, transcendent framework from which you can then derive the properties of the universe. You'll hear a lot of people condescendingly telling others how physics allows for the universe to spring into existence out of nothing and that God is not required, but what they don't know is that the only way for physics to explain the birth of the universe is to assume a pre-existent, transcendent framework, with internal structure and positive energy, obeying some transcendent laws of physics which give rise to quantum fluctuations, and only by assuming these extremely complex prerequisites can they explain the birth of the universe. So no, the universe din not spring into existence out of nothing, but out of something pretty complex.

    There are a lot of people who think that if they read an article on a scientific journal they know how the universe works and are quick to call others ignorant, but in fact they are every bit as ignorant. Typical debates between Christians and "wannabe scientists" go like this:

    Christian: – God created the universe.
    Scientist: – Well then who created God?
    Christian: – Nobody, God is eternal.
    Scientist: – That's ridiculous, let me tell you how it all happened. There's a predefined, incredibly complex transcendent framework, with internal structure and positive energy, with pre-existing, transcendent laws of physics that give rise to quantum fluctuations, and THAT gave birth to the universe.
    Christian: – And who created that framework with that particular internal structure, where does its energy come from, who created those particular laws of physics that make this vacuum (which is something, not nothing) unstable?
    Scientist: – Nobody, they are all pre-existing and transcendent.
    Christian: – So if I assume the notion of God as a transcendent entity, I'm wrong, because I can't answer the question of who created God, but your incredibly complex pre-existing, transcendent framework is ok to "just be there", it doesn't need a creator and it doesn't have to answer the same questions?
    Scientist: – …

    So science's claim that it can explain everything and that it doesn't need the notion of God is completely false. Physics is using exactly the same prerequisites as Christianity, it's just that Christians call these prerequisites "God" and scientists call them "vacuum".

    So I'd like all these self-assumed, condescending "rationalists" to answer these questions, which I'll state again, because they are essential:
    – who created the internal structure of the vacuum?
    – who created the laws of physics of the vacuum that predate the universe and give rise to quantum fluctuations necessary for the universe to be born?
    – where does the energy of the vacuum come from?

    After they realise they can't answer them and that they're exactly the same questions they're mocking the Christians for not being able to answer about God, perhaps they'll settle down a bit and realise they're every bit as ignorant as those who they are so condescendingly calling ignorant.

    Since physics can't deal with the notion of absolute nothing, no claims about the need or lack of need of God should be made.

  66. TheMoon

    December 17, 2018 at 2:40 am

    i like the guy on the right, not the moderator(but hes cool too tho).

  67. Summon256

    December 31, 2018 at 12:32 pm

    The pure "nothing" in its true essence only remains as such, when it isn't talked or thought about at all…let alone observered! Real "nothing" is only nothing, when there is well…"nothing" to observe, cuz it consists of "nothing" in its true form! (There is no difference in saying – "there is nothing that is there" and – "there is something, that is missing"! These are synonims! Its just a pessimist vs. optimist analogy, when pessimist claims the glass is half empty, whilst optimist claims its half filled!) If you claim you can observe it with ANY of your basic senses (No matter which one – hearing, touching, seeing, smelling or tasting), in other words if you can SENSE it ANY WAY – its not NOTHING anymore! Emptyness is not "nothing" it is – emptyness! Black color – is SOMETHING and not NOTHING…VACUUM of space is SOMETHING, not NOTHING…i can go on and on, but you should get the game by now anyway…

  68. Rogito

    January 4, 2019 at 4:18 pm

    2:10 *plays megalovania

  69. Krishnaprasad padmanaban

    January 11, 2019 at 5:10 am

    These western jokers should read Indian veda sastra

    Entire truth is revealed 5000 years before

  70. Rigel SG

    January 12, 2019 at 5:04 am

    Metaphysical mirrors

  71. Ser Korz

    February 3, 2019 at 6:23 am

    Are we talking about nothing? or about unobservable something in the void of nothing?

  72. Ser Korz

    February 3, 2019 at 6:37 am

    They will discover the nothing of the nothing and the something in it, when there is something. Right?

  73. Jp DeeCee

    February 9, 2019 at 5:31 pm

    what does nothing acually look like?????????

  74. Democracy dies in darkness

    February 24, 2019 at 6:12 pm

    Nothing does not exist

  75. steve4344

    February 26, 2019 at 8:18 pm

    Can you please accept that I think how I think. Wearing black is nothing.

  76. Charly Her

    March 7, 2019 at 3:29 pm

    Nothing is something. Take everything out and you have nothing… Obviously, something is nothing. And nothing is something. And that is why we all come to existence from nothing and slowly becoming something and eventually becoming somebody be it rich or poor.

  77. HeliumXenonKrypton

    March 8, 2019 at 1:29 pm

    It's weird that I commented on a video about nothingness ^^^ a couple days ago and now when I'm looking again the comment is deleted and I'm seeing nothingness where I had clearly typed some somethingness. Really like MAGIC !! : D

  78. Fatmir Shehu

    March 11, 2019 at 4:32 pm

    Amazing Emptiness

  79. Pragya Bhardwaj

    March 28, 2019 at 9:25 pm

    Hindu Vedic Science also spoke about String Theory – in what are considered world's oldest documented manuscripts ….
    They talk about something called Rashmis … Literally translated to lines of energy … And then they idolised this scientific concept into a mythological concept of 'Shiva & Shakti' …. Shiva – That what is nothing and beyond and Shakti – what gives meaning to nothing to translate into something …. And this process was done so that local people … Not pursuing the sciences could still remember the essence of this in some way and that this simplified knowledge could be passed through generations ..

  80. Pragya Bhardwaj

    March 28, 2019 at 9:28 pm

    The day Western Sciences start looking at Eastern philosophies and sciences for some of these concepts …. And try and take inspiration of some predefined concepts in ancient Hindu Scriptures …. And translate them into experiments … That day cosmology will grow by leaps and bounds ….

  81. adrienne gellman

    April 5, 2019 at 4:39 am

    Try THIS:TURN NOTHING INSIDE OUT

  82. Mark Jacobson

    April 6, 2019 at 12:09 am

    nothing is a symmetrical averaging out of opposing, virtual forces that, by random quantum fluctuation, became real.

  83. Joe Weis

    April 18, 2019 at 4:33 pm

    COSMIC QUANTUM FOAM ?

  84. gary stevenson

    April 18, 2019 at 11:03 pm

    Our brains dematerialize into mind through the nothingness of electromagnetic brain flux. It is in the sacred dimension of the mind where space and time and matter are inexistent that we find demons and paradises. It is in this dimension that the invisible mind sees but sees not in the Dream world Time and death. I am the mysterious Alif Laam Meem only God knew the meaning.

  85. Arlie Ferguson

    April 24, 2019 at 11:31 pm

    "Playful elaborations…a little potpourri of examples…"

  86. Alan Lloyd

    April 27, 2019 at 2:38 pm

    We don't know if NOTHINGNESS is possible. Even if there were no life, to observe it, the universe would still be here.

  87. George Michael

    May 4, 2019 at 2:27 am

    Come back to us Frank…

  88. HeliumXenonKrypton

    May 10, 2019 at 3:00 pm

    One guy who can't walk, and 4 others who can't think. This video is a PASS.

  89. Philip Turner

    May 22, 2019 at 4:28 am

    All this is getting very close to formalized madness

  90. Philip Turner

    May 22, 2019 at 4:30 am

    Honestly, these guys are becoming the spouters of the ultimate gibberish possible…or am I mad ??

  91. Dadson worldwide

    June 8, 2019 at 5:55 pm

    we had it right but detoured .we not the earth are at the center of everything and on the qantum scale our observations prove that we have the power to dictate waves or particles. real or illusion.

  92. UpShotPHX

    June 16, 2019 at 4:30 am

    Moderator is good but really needs to keep his mouth shut a lot more

  93. Milan Siroky

    June 20, 2019 at 3:37 pm

    Leftist fuck, got a stage so spew your leftist hate, Dont have shit to say about CNN and MSNBC LYING their asses off to push their agenda….just the fucking Fox network…Love the explanation on how exactly black holes loose the mass though. One half of virtual particle goes real via gravity energy from the hole….awesome show! (needs more Professor GREEN)

  94. Sophia Guidi

    July 1, 2019 at 6:14 am

    poxa… e a legenda?

  95. Donald Smith

    July 7, 2019 at 7:37 am

    "…Higgs bosons, if you can discover them,…" 37.20

  96. cooolway

    July 7, 2019 at 10:40 am

    This guy is trying hard to copy stephen hawking

  97. Steven Kates

    July 23, 2019 at 3:45 pm

    The background photo; what is it?

  98. Anthony Borderline

    July 26, 2019 at 8:15 pm

    Laymans question; what if the matter doesn't cause the curvature of space but vice versa? Flux and flow of space creates space for matter and density, so less-nothing would give space for something? Also, read below @LaMaisondeCasaHouse aka homehousebuildingmansion or some such .

  99. Eric McKenzie

    August 6, 2019 at 3:14 pm

    nothing is the matter

  100. tom mathew

    August 9, 2019 at 6:55 am

    What lies in the space if there is such a space between the quark and the antiquark?

Leave a Reply